Default Featured image

Secured Creditors’ Right to Credit Bid Affirmed

Debt Collection

This week, in RadLAX Gateway Hotel, LLC v. Amalgamated Bank, No. 11‐166 (U.S. May 29, 2012) the United States Supreme Court unanimously ruled that a secured lender must be given the right to credit bid up to the full amount of its loan where the debtor pursues a Chapter 11 plan that proposes to sell assets free and clear of liens. This decision resolves a split of authority in several circuits and is a significant win for secured creditors facing a debtor’s Chapter 11 bankruptcy plan.

As explained in the opinion, a bankruptcy plan confirmed over the objection of a secured creditor had to meet one of three requirements to be deemed “fair and equitable.” Under Bankruptcy Code Section 1129(b)(2)(A)(i), a secured creditor’s lien remains on the property and it receives deferred cash payments. Under Section (ii), the property is sold free and clear of the creditor’s lien, and the creditor receives a lien on the sale proceeds. The sale, however, must be conducted pursuant to Section 363(k) of the Bankruptcy Code which provides that the creditor may credit bid at the sale, up to the amount of its loan.  Under Section (iii), the plan has to provide the creditor with the “indubitable equivalent” of its loan.

In the case before the Supreme Court, the debtors sought to confirm their plan under Section (iii) without providing the lender the right to credit bid. Instead, the debtors proposed a plan to sell the property free and clear of the lender’s liens and repay the lender using the sale proceeds.

The Court reasoned that Section (ii) is a detailed provision that sets forth the requirements for confirming a plan that seeks to sell property free and clear of liens. Section (iii), however, is a more broadly worded provision and says nothing about a sale. The Court, relying on a well established principal of statutory interpretation that “the specific governs the general.” held that the general language of clause (iii), “although broad enough to include it, will not be held to apply to a matter specifically dealt with” in clause (ii).  Thus, if the plan includes a sale of the property, then the secured lender has a right to credit bid.  That right, the Court noted, helps protect the creditor against the risk that the property is sold for a depressed price and it allows the secured lender to purchase the property for what it considers a fair market price without committing additional cash. This is a victory for secured lenders.

If you have questions regarding such matters, or if you have any other questions about real estate legal issues, contact Brewer Offord & Pedersen LLP at (650) 327-2900, or visit us on the web at


Latest Posts

Real Estate Contracts & Transactions

Out of Contract? Not So Fast…

by Adam Pedersen, Esq. on August 28, 2018

In the highly-competitive real estate market in California, agents are being more aggressive in enforcing contract terms. So before you tell your client that you are “out of contract”, you might want to be sure the contract is actually cancelled! [Read More]

Landlord & Tenant Law

What a Three-Day Notice to Pay Rent or Quit Really Means

by Brewer Firm Team on September 20, 2018

It is after Labor Day weekend and that means school supplies, summer vacation credit card bills, and preparing for the holidays. With all these added costs, the tenant may not have enough money to pay rent and the landlord serves [Read More]

Real Estate Contracts & Transactions

Can A Buyer Back Out of a Non-Contingent Offer?

by Simon Offord, Esq. on October 2, 2018

In my last article, we discussed liquidated damages in the context of a residential real estate purchase contract.  This article will examine whether a buyer may have a right to back out of a contract and receive their full deposit [Read More]